منابع مشابه
Refocusing on Gender: Can Focal Concerns Theory Explain Gender Disparities in Sentencing Outcomes?
Title of thesis: REFOCUSING ON GENDER: CAN FOCAL CONCERNS THEORY EXPLAIN GENDER DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING OUTCOMES? Rebecca L. Richardson, Master of Arts, 2015 Thesis directed by: Professor Brian Johnson Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Focal concerns theory argues that sentencing decisions reflect judges’ beliefs about three primary considerations: blameworthiness of the defendan...
متن کاملSummary. Sentencing law and sentencing decision making
The initial context of this research – judicial cooperation with regard to consistency in sentencing This dissertation is part of a research project in which the phenomenon of judicial cooperation in several areas of the law has been taken as a starting point. The concept of judicial cooperation describes informal structures and products thereof of judicial policymaking for the purpose of the s...
متن کاملHave Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparities Increased in an Advisory Guidelines Regime? Evidence from Booker
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were promulgated in response to concerns of widespread disparities in sentencing. After almost two decades of determinate sentencing, the Guidelines were rendered advisory in United States v. Booker. How has greater judicial discretion affected interjudge disparities, or differences in sentencing outcomes that are attributable to the mere happenstance of the se...
متن کاملChapter Four: Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Federal Sentencing Today
Fair sentencing is individualized sentencing. Unwarranted disparity is defined as different treatment of individual offenders who are similar in relevant ways, or similar treatment of individual offenders who differ in characteristics that are relevant to the purposes of sentencing. Membership in a particular demographic group is not relevant to the purposes of sentencing, and there is no reaso...
متن کاملMandatory Sentencing
Adam Graycar Director There is a widely held belief that the imposition of a mandatory sentence for a second or third offence will have a significant deterrent effect on that individual and will send a message to potential offenders. Advocates argue that it will bring consistency in sentencing and appease public concern about crime and punishment. This proposition has been debated vigorously in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of American Legal Studies
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2049-4092
DOI: 10.1515/bjals-2017-0010